| Follow Ups | Post Followup | AK Site. WWWBoard |
| Exactly this its the concept that makes me mad...but given the circumstances you do your very best ;) | |
|---|---|
| Author: Code(10) | June 3, 1999 at 23:31:38 |
| in reply to: Our feelings aren't hurt. Now that we understand that you mean the "concept" is shitty, we agree with you. (ctxt) posted by K.B.I., Inc. on June 3, 1999 at 21:28:19 | |
|
> Hey, we would like nothing better than to be able to import > the SA-85M in the configuration it was sold in 1986. Back > then the rifle had a pistol grip or folding stock, a > bayonet lug with a superb bayonet, flash suppressor; it > came with 3-30 round mags, etc. > > Unfortunately, Bush banned this execution in 1989. We > altered the gun then and had to eliminate the suppressor, > pistol grip and bayonet lug. Frankly, we felt fortunate to > be able to continue to import the rifle, even though we > were seriously disappointed in having to alter the gun. > > Then came the 94' Crime Bill. All of us importers though > that this was the end of these rifles. Again, quite > frankly, we were quite surprised and pleased to learn that > we could continue to import the rifle without any further > modifications from the Bush ban. (In fact, at that time, > BATF almost allowed us to eliminate the thumbhole stock and > revert to the pistol grip. They weren't sure which was the > controlling law, the Bush ban on pistol grips or the Crime > Bill ban on two or more "bad" features.) BATF advised us > that to "be safe", we should stick with the thumbhole > stock. Not wanting to take an adversarial position with the > agency that runs our commercial lives, we chose to "be > safe" and continue with the thumbhole. > > Fast forward to 1998, and now it's the Clinton ban. No more > imports of rifles that could accept a "LCMM" (large > capacity military magazine). We were devastated. However, > after much careful deliberation with the manufacturer and > ATF, we embarked on the project to completely retool the > receiver to accept a proprietary 10 round magazine, and to > tool up for the new magazine. We felt that there would > still be a market in the US for the FEG rifle, even in its > current "politically correct" configuration. We invested a > small fortune in this endeavor and hopefully we are right > and the market will accept this new rifle, or we are wrong > and we will lose our shirts. We think the jury is still out > on this issue although we have shipped a good quantity of > the new guns and most have been well received by > wholesalers, dealers and consumers. > > And, just when we think that it might be smooth sailing > from here on, we see that US Rep Nadler is trying to attach > an amendment to the Juvenile Justice Bill being considered > in the House of Representatives, that would ban our new > SA-2000M, because it has a thumbhole stock! To add insult > to injury, Nadler even wants to ban the importation of. 22 > caliber rifles that look like so-called "assault rifles". > > Sorry for the long winded history lesson. We just wanted to > make the point that we love this rifle, always have and > always will. We are only trying to stay in business by > modifying again and again to comply with new regulations > that keep coming our way. > > I personally have two of the original 1986 SA-85M rifles > and they will always be my favorites. However, the SA-2000M > is a viable alternative if someone wants the superb > functioning characteristics of an AK type rifle. > > Feel free to give us your comments any time. We appreciate > all feedback, pro or con. > > Sincerely, Michael B. Kassnar President K.B.I., Inc. |
  | |
| Follow Ups | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| | ||
| Served by ruboard 1.2.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. | ||